skip to Main Content
Need legal advice? Click here or call (212) 725-6422. Attorneys, click here.

Practice Advisory: Implications of Moncrieffe v. Holder

IDP, the American Immigration Council, and the National Immigration Project have issued a practice advisory on the implications for drug charges and other issues involving the categorical approach of the Supreme Court’s long-awaited decision in Moncrieffe v. Holder. The Supreme Court held that an offense that punishes the transfer of small amounts of marijuana for no remuneration cannot be deemed a “drug trafficking crime” aggravated felony under the categorical approach.  The Court’s 7-2 decision is also likely to have a beneficial impact on some other key issues regarding the proper way to assess the immigration consequences of convictions.

Our practice advisory covers:

  1. the holding in Moncrieffe;
  2. the decision’s potential broader implications;
  3.  strategies for noncitizen criminal defendants; and
  4. steps that lawyers (or immigrants themselves) should take immediately in pending or already concluded removal proceedings affected by Moncrieffe.
Back To Top
×Close search
Search

With a year marked by hateful and divisive policies behind us, IDP continues to look towards the future in the fight for immigrants' rights.

Your partnership and support are critical to this work -- make a commitment today, and stand with IDP for justice for all immigrants!

Donate